The Whimsical Tarot

A Review by Kimberly Schwartz

    wtmagician.jpg (14787 bytes)
        The topic comes up from time to time on tarot e-lists:   "What deck would you recommend for working with children?"   Invariably, the questioner is directed to a RWS clone which has soft coloring and fanciful artwork, like the Tarot of a Moon Garden, or Hanson Roberts decks, or to the Inner Child Cards.  With the publication of the new Whimsical Tarot by U.S. Games, however, I think that's about to change.  Designer Dorothy Morrison and artist Mary Hanson-Roberts have come up with an ideal children's deck.  It's not just for kids, though.  More on this later.

        Some general information first:  This 78-card deck is standard-sized for U.S. Games (2-3/4 by 4-3/4).  The artwork is, naturally enough, reminiscent of the Hanson-Roberts deck, gently rendered in colored pencil (or chalk/pastel).  Each card has a white border containing a colorful "frame" for the card image; the frames are decorated with flowers, foliage, and scrollwork, and are color-keyed for the suits:  orange for Rods, green for Cups, red for Swords, and blue for Pentacles.  The frames on the minors are wider at the bottom allowing space for a "name plate" for the card.  Numbers on the suit cards are written out, as opposed to using numerals i.e., "Ten of Rods" as opposed to "10 of Rods" and the frame on each of the 2 - 10 cards also contains the requisite number of suit symbols.  On the Major Arcana cards, the frames are narrower, and feature a rainbow blending of colors used in the Minors.  Roman numerals in the bottom center of the cards order the Majors, and the title of each Major card is written inside the frame at the top of the card.  Strength is eight, Justice is eleven, and The Fool is zero.  The backs are reversible, and feature a very attractive abstract flower design framed with stylized Celtic knotwork.  Average weight coated cardstock was used for printing, and the deck is packaged in a standard U.S. Games flip-top box, and comes with a LWB, such as it is.  More on this later, also.

        I really like this deck.  It is billed as "A Deck for Children and the Young at Heart" and it is apparent that Morrison put some careful thought into the process of sifting through fairy tales, fables, and myths to select images for each card.  In the introduction to the LWB, she writes:

"Childhood stores are built of simple ideas, have simple plots, and teach simple lessons.  The brain already knows this stuff, so there's nothing to sort through or think about.  That being the case, the messages arrive undisturbed."wtfourofpentacles.jpg (15298 bytes)

This is a good description of the way this deck works in readings.   Any child (or adult, for that matter) who knows the stories will be able to look at the cards and have an "ah-ha" experience - instantly deriving meaning, without sifting through layers of symbolism or complex analysis.  I found myself laughing out loud with delight at how perfect some of the images really are.  For instance, the Four of Pentacles card shows the Aesop's fable of A Dog and His Bone - the one where a dog who has a bone happens to pass by a stream and, seeing his reflection, thinks he is seeing another dog with another bone.  Being greedy, he opens his mouth to grab the bone from the other dog, and in so doing, loses his own bone into the fast-moving water.    I probably never will be able to look at that stifled, grasping man in the RWS Four of Pentacles again without thinking of that dog!      wtemperor.jpg (15093 bytes)
        Of course, one could select any set of 78 images from fairy tales and use them as an oracle or guide - likely with meaningful results.  What makes this deck remarkable, I think, is that the images selected and the meanings they connote actually conform to at least one generally accepted interpretation for the corresponding RWS card - meaning that a child who learns with this deck should be able to make a fairly easy transition to any number of other decks when the time comes to do so.  It is this quality which, in my view, sets this deck above the other fairy-tale-based decks like the Inner Child Cards and the Tarocchi delle Fiabe as a learning deck.  For example:  In the Inner Child Cards, the Emperor card depicts the story of The Emperor's New Clothes.  Ok, there is an emperor in the story, but what has that vain and foolish character got to do with the tarot Emperor?  A look at the accompanying book yields a complex line of reasoning having to do with the the blending of the polarized energies of the Emperor and Empress; it's an interesting meditation for a grownup, but not something I'd want to try to explain to a child.  In the Whimsical Tarot, on the other hand, the Emperor card depicts Santa Claus - who, as every child knows, will provide for you and do nice things for you, but expects you to be good, the way you should, every single day - that is, to follow the rules.  Simplistic?  Yes.  Childlike?   Most certainly.  Nevertheless, a child using this deck can immediately relate to those aspects of the tarot Emperor, and will carry that learning with her - and will, I think, be less confused and better able to work with other tarot Emperors later on than a child who has associated the tarot Emperor with that naked guy who was the laughing-stock of the village.

    wttower.jpg (15737 bytes)
        As another example, both the Inner Child Cards and the Tarocchi delle Fiabe depict Rapunzel on the Tower card.  Sure, there's a tall structure in both fairy tale and tarot card, but so what?  What does the story of Rapunzel teach us about the tarot Tower in terms a child could understand?  By contrast, the Whimsical Tarot shows the Big Bad Wolf blowing down the Little Pig's house of straw - a Tower experience if ever there were one, and moreover, something a child who knows the story will understand immediately - along with the lesson that diligence, resourcefulness, and advance planning can lessen the impact of the crash.

        Almost every card in this deck shows a scene or character that is recognizable as being from a particular story.  There are a few exceptions among the Minors where we see the occasional card which shows a "stock" fairy tale occurrence -  like the Ten of Cups, which depicts a prince bringing his princess home to his kingdom, presumably to "live happily ever after."  This scene could be from any number of fairy tales, of course.  It may be that artist and designer had a particular one in mind, but it's not instantly discernable from looking at the card.   However, this doesn't detract from the readability.  I think "happily ever after" is a pretty good start to getting a grasp of the Ten of Cups, and it's a phrase I added to my tarot notebook after studying this deck.

        When discussing decks for children, one of the concerns usually has to do with the "scary" cards.  Whimsical Tarot handles these sensitively, I believe, by choosing images to which a child can relate - but again, there is a core of meaning to the images selected which will lead the child in a natural progression to greater insight later on:  Death is Sleeping Beauty, the Devil is Pinnochio while he was still a puppet, the Ten of Swords is Humpty Dumpty ("....and all the king's horses, and all the king's men; couldn't put Humpty together again.")

        The Aces of each suit depict an ornately decorated suit symbol.   The Courts are interesting:  the King and Queen of each suit do not appear to be characters from any particular story that I recognize.  They appear to be a matched set in each suit - the King and Queen of Pentacles are both dressed in green and brown, the King and Queen of Cups are both dressed in blue and green, and so forth.   For some reason, the King and Queen of Cups are depicted with their backs to us, while all the other Kings and Queens are facing us.  It may be that Morrison and Hanson-Roberts intended some sort of seasonal correspondences as well - we see the King and Queen of Swords dressed in fur and standing in the snow and the King and Queen of Pentacles are standing in a forest where it is obviously autumn - but if so, it is not a set of seasonal correspondences with which I am familiar.  The issue is further confused by the fact that the foliage on the borders of the courts doesn't appear to match the "season" in the scenes - for instance, we see fall leaves in the border of the Rods suit, but not in the border of the Pentacles suit. 

        Unlike the King and Queen, the Knight of each suit does appear to be a story character - Br'er Fox as the Knight of Swords, for example.  The Pages are unlike any other deck I've ever seen.  Instead of a person or character, each shows an item, other than the suit symbol, which is representative of the qualities of the suit - a pile of coins and ledger sheet for the Pents, a herald's trumpet for the Rods, a crystal ball or bubble for the Cups, and a spy glass for the Swords.

        There are a few things I would have done differently about this deck.  I would have used Arabic numerals instead of Roman numerals on the Majors, because children generally learn the Arabic numerals first.  I would probably have used Arabic numerals on the Minors as well, instead of "writing out" the words for the numbers - again, because children recognize the numerals before they learn to read the words for the numbers.  I would probably have used different colors on the borders of the Minors, because I think even young children are capable of learning that "Cups are blue, blue is for water; Pentacles are green, like grass on the earth" and so forth.  But these are small matters.  My chief complaint is not with the deck at all, but with the LWB, which is sparse, even for a LWB.  It contains a brief introduction, simplistic keywords for each card, and descriptions of four spreads of increasing difficulty, which are listed by age group (The One Card Spread for ages 3 - 6, etc.).  It would have been a 200% improvement if a line had been added for each card naming the tale or character the card depicts.  I hope Morrison and U.S. Games are planning a companion book for this deck.   It certainly deserves one, and perhaps it would straighten out my confusion about those Court cards.

        All in all, the Whimsical Tarot is a charming deck - pleasing to the eye, refreshing for the soul, and worth adding to any collection.  I think it's the best deck I've seen for children.  Adult beginners would probably also find it valuable, especially if used in connection with another RWS family deck for comparative study.  It would be a fun deck to use for readings for clients who are not familiar with tarot.

Whimsical Tarot
©U.S. Games Systems, Inc., Stamford CT USA 06902
ISBN #1-57281-253-2
Illustrations from Whimsical Tarot  reproduced by permission
of U.S. Games, Inc.  Copyright by U.S. Games Systems, Inc. 
Further reproduction prohibited.
This page and its contents ©Kimberly S. Schwartz, 2001.

 

Visit the Over the Edge Designs Online Shoppe!

Back to Over the Edge Tarot Home Page

 

Hit Counter